Guys, no need to be fighting over here.
Also this @rbrylawski guy is probably an Apple Fan Boy doing his job and getting points on the Apple Forum to grow his level (or whatever that means).
Truth is: all the people complaining here are probably Apple users for quite some time and kept on buying their iPhones either every year or every other year. Nevertheless we are consumers disappointed with a promise that has been made to us. Which is fairly fine since the Ads do portrait an iPhone without protection going through everyday life without a single tear to it, correct?
Well, I'm not alone apparently on the complaint that we had our iPhones 11 or 11 Pro Max scratched within the first days of NORMAL use (mine was within 24 hours - my iPhone 8 continues intact without screen protection ever). So this is statistically a proven case that either:
- There's a bunch of bad intentioned people who drops their phone into sapphire (or level 6/8) components and want their money back after misbehaving. OR
- There's a bunch of consumers who have been mislead to believe that: Buying a product advertised as a daily accessory resistant to the possible conditions of normal usage without EXTRA protection devices was worth their money.
I prefer to believe the second and I guess Apple should probably have a look into it (or doing already). So I encourage whoever else had this issue to come and continue posting here.
We are consumers and business is only business if this both way transactions keep on happening in a healthy level for both us and companies. If one of the sides breaks the deal, business won't go that well.
Let's be hopeful for a solution soon, and not defend the purchase of stuff to go around the phone at an extra cost just because what we've been offered doesn't comply to the promise.
#applescratchgate