RichardTS wrote:
Sorry but it is you who remain confused, quite possibly because you exist solely in an Apple world where everything is rosy except the functionality you don’t think you need.
I exist in both worlds.
Until I retired, a few years ago, I was fully immersed in the corporate Windows world, complete with Outlook email clients talking to corporate Exchange servers.
I seldom had a problem getting Outlook to do what I wanted. (Of course, I’m also far from any typical corporate user: I’m highly proficient with the technology, and I know what is going on “under the hood”. For instance, I actually know the International Internet Standards, including those governing emails.)
This is NOT about rendering. This is about the difference between embedding and attaching. It is also about your failure to understand how a lot of people who work in the PC world use iPhones every day.
I have always been saying that «This is NOT about rendering»!
When have I said otherwise?
However, this is, likewise, not «about [any] difference between embedding and attaching» of files, including pictures and images, to emails: the International Internet Standards have specified the use of email attachments, regardless the particular formatting used for the email body!
The only difference is in «rendering», since, regardless of the appearance («rendering»), the files, including pictures and images, are kept as attachments to the email.
It’s only those that judge purely by appearances that think otherwise.
I don’t have a Mac but I am pretty sure that Mac mail works pretty much the same as iPhone mail-photos come in as embedded and Apple has written enough code to extract the embedded photos so that they may be saved in bulk with a menu option.
While Mac Mail likely «works pretty much the same as iPhone mail», this is all covered by compliance with International Internet Standards for email: including the attachment of files, even for rich-text (text/html) email bodies, which can display images inline with formatted text (what all too many are calling “embedded”, as if it were not included as attachments), just as with webpages. (After all, it uses the same HTML web standard!)
In the PC world one can ATTACH multiple photos to an email OR embed photos. Yes, Outlook lacks the functionality to extract bulk photos from an email but it can save literally hundreds of attachments in bulk. …
(Emphasis added)
There is no need for any additional code, since the files are attachments, already!
In fact, other than Outlook (and its derivatives), no other email client lacks this functionality.
If it requires some special functionality, why do no other email clients have any issue?
Have you not even paused to reflect upon that question?
This is what has escaped you; there are TWO ways of attaching objects to email in the PC world. Apple lacks this. The PC world does not have that incomprehensible Apple functionality separation between photos and other types of files. In the PC world photos are simply another type of file.
…
Actually, by the International Internet Standards for email, there is but a single way «of attaching objects to email». However, there are at least «TWO ways of» rendering (displaying) emails with attachments!
This is independent of what the attached files may be (though the way such attachments may be displayed [rendered] may differ, somewhat, between email clients, in much the same way webpages can look different on different browsers).