Please, casual_observer, don’t fall into the trap of judging purely by appearances.
Yes. Practically all email clients will render (display) attachments inline with the rest of the email (such as the text) when displaying a rich-text email (which uses HTML, just like webpages, by the way): that is precisely what the email Internet standard states they should do, are supposed to do.
While Gmail, for instance, will render (display) rich-text emails in that manner, it continues to allow you, the user, to perform bulk attachment operations (like bulk-saves) the same way as with the old plain-text emails.
Similarly for Apple Mail.
I suspect that Yahoo and AOL are similar.
Isn’t Hotmail a Microsoft email system? Sort of a publicly available Microsoft Exchange server?
If so, unless one uses a third party client, one may fall into the Outlook issue, again, there.
Those of us that are giving this assessment are not doing so lightly!
Like me, they have studied the reports carefully, and worked diligently on reproducing the issue(s) and finding workarounds.
It was the commonalties of both the issues and the workarounds that lead to these conclusions.
We are not privy to what Apple actually changed, though we can easily and directly verify, for instance, that the files are still included as attachments: that has never changed, and, as I’ve stated, highly unlikely to ever change, in the foreseeable future.
(Anyone that knows enough about the technology can view the raw email, and verify such.)
Part of the reason texting “pics” works is it doesn’t use the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) at all. Instead, it uses Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) protocols. (Such MMS messages may not include any formatting, so they may be transformed into plain-text emails, during the transfer process.)