All file types are attached, Teggerman.
Why is that concept so difficult for some to grasp, or seem that way? Is it that so many judge purely by what they see, and go no further?
If you have yet to see «moving pictures» formatted inline with text, then just wait a few years (probably less). I’ve already seen it back in the ‘90s.
I am highly doubtful that «MS Exchange» changes the formatting of emails based upon the types of attached files. (Incidentally, the file-types are not determined by anything as crude and fragile as file extensions. They have never been. The email [package] actually contains “flags” for the various file-types. The standard even permits multiple versions of any given file—even of the email body itself.)
Unfortunately, even while I’m highly doubtful, I can’t be completely certain «MS Exchange» doesn’t do any of a number of non standards-compliant manipulations.
After all, we have seen how direct Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) transfers to «MS Exchange» email servers make a significant difference in how «MS» Outlook deals with the received email. Why that should be, if «MS Exchange» doesn’t do any of a number of non standards-compliant manipulations, is a mystery, at this time.
As for the use-case: the intended use-case of email has always been human communication, in a very similar manner to word processing documents.
Anything you can have in an electronic document, you (should be able to) have within an email.
It is for human consumption.
The attachment of files was, really, more incidental to that intended use.
(Of course, the ability to have rich formatted content, including images and other multimedia, has been an ever evolving aspect of this intended usage.)
You, nor anyone else, is to be “blamed” for having a tool, at the ready, and finding uses for that tool that are not completely aligned with the intended usage. It’s, essentially, human nature.
I’m sure you’ve heard of the saying about a person having only a hammer…
The fact that such use worked, OK, for years, simply helped “miss-train” you, and others. Even to the point that y’all probably didn’t even notice the developments of tools that are better aligned with this particular use-case.
Now, if y’all were like most users, and you only sent images/pictures on the odd occasion, the mismatch wouldn’t tend to bother y’all, I expect.
For those whose livelihood depends upon transferring large numbers of images/photos, and/or other file-types, to remote locations and/or recipients; the lack of knowledge of tools that better fit such use is astonishing.