The Crucial SSD looks Ok with its temperatures which is very surprising as the BX500 series is very easy to overheat. In the future I highly recommend going with the MX500 series for much better performance. I've tested a few of the BX500 series SSDs and found them to be extremely slow (as slow as a hard drive) and tend to easily overheat which will also throttle their speed. I've never had a problem with the MX500 series SSDs in our organization's Macs except for a firmware bug that incorrectly sets the "Current Pending Sector" attribute temporarily, then later resets it. The bug was reported to Crucial shortly after the SSD was first launched (five years ago?) and Crucial has never fixed it. It doesn't hurt anything except you when you use an app like DriveDx which monitors the SSD's SMART attributes it keeps falsely alerting you.
I've seen DriveDx and other SMART monitoring apps incorrectly interpret an SSD's health so I only rely on these apps to alert me to potential issues which I then verify by manually examining the actual SMART attributes and health report. If you look at the health report for the Crucial SSD you will see that the "Lifetime Max Temp" is 113F (45C) and the "Temperature Max Limit" is 158F (70C) and the "Recommended Max Temp" is 149F (65C) so this SSD is well within its expected operating range.
Now the Samsung SSD looks like it has an overheating issue. The temp for the Samsung SSD appears to be at its "Temperature Max Limit" of 158F (70C) for the "Lifetime Max Temp" value which is the highest temp the SSD has reached. This is not completely unusual for an SSD depending on where it is located in the computer and the cooling it can receive. I'm wondering whether having the Samsung SSD behind the optical drive is trapping the heat and the SSD isn't getting enough air flowing over it. These iMacs can get hot inside. Keep in mind when an SSD reaches the "Temperature Max Limit" which is usually 70C (158F), then the SSD will be throttled to help lower its temperature which means the SSD will slow down significantly. Excessive heat can prematurely wear and potentially damage an SSD's NAND memory.
However, the Read & Write speed of the SSD is much less than the Crucial SSD (perhaps the Samsung SSD is your boot SSD?). The "Wear Leveling Count" has dropped a good bit on the Samsung SSD, but you have written 17.7 TB to it as well, but it still seems like a bit excessive drop. Do you have TRIM enabled? How much free space is on the Samsung SSD? I know that "smartctl" which is the actual utility DriveDX uses to access the drives' health information doesn't report the speeds properly in its test, but the difference between the two SSDs is significant unless the Samsung is the current boot drive when you ran DriveDx.
Does the Samsung SSD have a newer firmware version available?
Except for the Samsung SSD overheating I would say both SSDs look healthy.
FYI, in the future please configure the apps to report the temperatures in Celcius since that is what all the review sites and benchmark sites use reporting system temps and drive temps.
We'll see what your EtreCheck report has to say.