Aperture in macOS High Sierra...

Hi,


This is just feedback back to the Aperture community.


I updated my MacBook Air (2014) to the latest macOS 10.13, all seems good with Aperture. Adjustments look fine, loupe, importing, exporting.

If I come across any issues, I'll post back.


I do have a Mac Pro (2010 SSD w/ Apple RAID) to update. That'll wait until the WACOM drivers are released end of Oct.


I'm still waiting on a good alternative to Aperture...

Currently the ACD See app (although well spec'd for Windows) has very good potential. Currently there is a beta for Mac users.

I will still check in on Capture One / Lightroom (?7) on occasion.


ATM Aperture is still working (for now) 😎

Posted on Sep 26, 2017 5:48 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Sep 27, 2017 1:39 PM

léonie is correct about your Mac… it will eventually die and/or become useless. This is how I decided to deal with the issue:


My “working” Aperture computer is a 2009 Mac Pro which reached end-of-life 1-2 years ago (Apple stopped making replacement parts). I run it on Yosemite to avoid the few minor problems that Aperture has with more recent OS’s. Last year, I bought a used 2012 Mac Pro that I use for all my other work — it is now running High Sierra. I use “Carbon Copy Cloner” to copy an updated version of my Aperture library to the new computer every few days (CCC is fantastic!). I don’t do any edits on the new computer, but my Aperture library is available for reference, plus this copy acts as another backup. If needed, I can install Yosemite on the newer computer and use it as a “back up” computer for Aperture if/when my other computer dies.


I am slowly migrating my photos to Lightroom on the new computer, but want to complete a huge project of scanning/editing ~50,000 old family photos (from 1885 to 2003) in Aperture before I use Lightroom exclusively. This project will take ~2-3 more years to finish, so hopefully one, or both computers will still be operational. After that, I will simply use Aperture as an archive and use Lightroom for all my future (digital camera) work.


Finally, I also have been exporting a copy of my final edited jpegs to the “Photos” app on the newer computer. Photos — or some future version of the software — will probably be around as long as Apple exists. I periodically give my family members an updated copy of the Photos library. The Aperture and/or Lightroom libraries will simply die after I stop using them. No one will want to deal with those programs, but the Photos app is used by all my family members. This should help assure that the photos out-live me!


The 2012 Mac will probably be at “end-of-life” in the next year, or so. The 2009 Mac is easily the longest I have ever used a computer. However, I can’t imagine using either computer 5 years from now. You’ll have to face the final demise of Aperture at some point! You don’t want all your photos to be lost because you didn’t migrate to a “living” program!

130 replies

Sep 27, 2017 9:58 AM in response to Gary O'Kane

Great news, I'm someone else still using Aperture, tried a few others but I keep coming back to Aperture.

My iMac is too old to run Sierra, but I was hanging off updating my Mac Book Pro to 10.13 until I heard I could still run Aperture on it.

I store a lot of Aperture exported folders and projects on external hard drives, would I still be able access them when the file system on my Mac Book Pro is changed with High Sierra ?

Sep 30, 2017 8:19 AM in response to Duchy777

Duchy777,

I have been working on the 50,000 old photos for ~15 years — I just work on it periodically when I want to. That way it becomes more of a hobby rather than a chore. I bought a Nikon film/slide scanner when I started the project (they longer make the scanner) and use a flatbed scanner for the photos with no film. I also have a ScanSnap iX500 that I use for document scanning — it is an amazing scanner! I have scanned all my parent’s and grandparent’s letters and postcards to preserve for future generations (plus current important documents to get rid of all my office “paper”).


Scanning the old photos is actually not a huge part of the time I spend on the project. Most of the time is spent gathering information for photos, identifying the people, location, date, adding a description, then adding keywords so the photos are gathered in “smart galleries.” I will typically have from 5 to 15 galleries per year, depending on how many photos are available for that year.


I include all this information in the photo so I can locate the photos on a map, by date, person, etc. Aperture adds the “face names” as keywords on export — which is one reason I want to finish the project in Aperture. All this “imbedded information” makes the photos independent of a specific photo program. Any decent photo DAM will use the embedded location, date, description and keywords. I use the old letters to help determine all this information, then write a yearly narrative of family events. All of this is interesting to me, so it makes it more of an enjoyable hobby than a chore. There are many different “chores” to complete this, so I don’t get bored doing one thing for a long period of time. I just complete one year at a time so I cycle through these various chores every couple months. I have learned a great deal about my parents, grandparents, etc. while completing this project. The photos have much more meaning to me after I went through all this. Also, my kids can have this as a permanent record of their heritage. They can look at a photo of a “stranger” and it will now mean something to them.


Anyway, my point is that preserving the photos can actually be an enjoyable hobby if you enjoy doing the kind of family research I am into. If that is not your “thing,” scanning the photos in a quick and easy manner — like using the ScanSnap — is a fantastic way to easily preserve photos that may otherwise be lost in a shoebox in the basement!

Oct 3, 2017 3:05 PM in response to Gary O'Kane

That is great news about Aperture and High Sierra. I have been holding off doing the upgrade until I read that Aperture was compatible, so thank you to everyone here! I have a huge number of photos (126,000) in Aperture and I dread the day when I have to switch over to Lightroom. I don't want to get on the Adobe treadmill of paying a monthly fee for the rest of my life for their Creative Cloud. And shame on Adobe that if you do buy a standalone version of Lightroom, they will not provide you with any updates. Aperture has served me fine for many years, and I have yet to find anything else that comes close for my particular workflow.

Oct 5, 2017 10:29 AM in response to nigbo

nigbo wrote:


Just use the menue item under Files: Import Catalogue>ApertureLibrary...

Look for your catalogue to import and choose and start importing.

This works for me without any problems.


Herwig

I have tried in several ways to get ON1 to open an Aperture Library. So far I have had no luck in doing so. I am using ON1 Photo Raw 2017 (v.11.6.3844) and macOS 10.12.6.

First of of all, I see no "Import Catalog" option under Files. My ON1 software does not seem to recognize my Aperture Library. I tried adding a 'Cataloged Folder'. I even dragged my Library into the 'Drop Your Folders Here to Catalog' with no positive result. My Aperture Libraries are Managed not Referenced.

I'm not sure what I doing wrong, but importing my Aperture Library to ON1 isn't working.

Thanks for your help anyway. I do appreciate it.


Jerry

Oct 7, 2017 4:58 AM in response to Gary O'Kane

I updated to High Sierra and now the Supplemental update. Last night I was working with Aperture importing scanned photos and creating a slide show (it's great for slide shows).... and it crashed on me throwing a memory dump on the screen. I'm running it on a mid-2011 iMac with 8 Gig of RAM. Never had that happen before but I'm hoping to limp along with Aperture for a while. It's perfect for me. Sad to see it go one day.

Nov 1, 2017 12:33 PM in response to Gary O'Kane

Thank you for posting this info. I will update to High Sierra as soon as I'm done with a project i'm working on that uses my Aperture photos then I will try it on my late 2015 27" iMac. I have also been looking at ACD see . I like much of it and it is similar to Aperture in a number of ways but what troubles me is that it has been in development for quite a while and there is very little feedback on it so I'm wondering if it will actually ever come out. I wish you the best and thanks again.

Ron

Nov 7, 2017 11:34 PM in response to Ron Taube1

Thanks for this advice, Ron and Leonie. Luminar looks like a good choice for RAW too. But it seems to me that it is meant for manipulating photos photoshop style, what I am looking for is not special effects, but the normal developing possibilities to get the best out of my photos and stick to reality as close as possible. Does luminar have the usual shadow and highlight controls?

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Aperture in macOS High Sierra...

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.