Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Cover flow missing - Mojave Gallery is no replacement?

Why would Apple replace Cover flow with gallery? They are different


1st - Cover flow was a fast and informative method of scrolling thru visual files quickly as images, while also viewing a list of data below. I could see any data I wanted, dates, sizes, and critical COMMENTS that I make with all my files. As I work I NEED to see that data when scrolling thru images!


2nd - I Prefer the vertical nature of Cover flow because I could open multiple narrow windows, and nest them beside one another. I cannot open multiple windows of Gallery and do the same, inefficient use of screen space and lack of data.


3rd - And worst - Gallery does NOT support mouse scrolling??? due to the horizontal nature of the gallery file list.

Horrible design


PLEASE BRING BACK COVERFLOW !! Add it in addition to Gallery for those of us who depend on it for our work

macOS Mojave (10.14), coverflow gallery

Posted on Sep 27, 2018 2:38 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Oct 6, 2018 7:32 AM

Absolutely infuriating. This seriously impacts my ability to do my job and has crippled my performance. I do MASSIVE data ETL's (extract, transform, load) and after each job, two .csv files are produced with "Successes" and "Errors" and having the cover flow allowed me to keep the list sorted by last modified date to group each "report" that was used with the outputted success and error files and then "preview" what the data was for, and what the errors were. Cover flow made very quick and easy to find what I needed. Now...I gotta either use gallery which, AWESOME it's in alphabetical order, thanks for making that completely unhelpful and useless, or the three column view which groups it alphabetically THEN by last modified, again completely unhelpful and useless. I'm now forced to open multiple files in Sublime Text or OpenOffice to find what I need to be able to effectively do my job.


Give us back cover flow; it's critical for not only my job, but many others that are in a similar job role/function. Look at the list of files I now have to either guess or OPEN unnecessarily until I find the file I need again.

User uploaded file

141 replies

Oct 7, 2018 2:14 AM in response to Buleohara

This is UTTER MADNESS ... why would the MacOS team drop one of the signature features of finder, in existence since it was popularised on the iPod?? My biggest problem with the gallery view in Finder is the bottom thumbnails can only be enlarged from micro size to postage-stamp size ... really hard to see content of photos and vids.


This feature is in https://cocoatech.com/#/ PathFinder ... does Apple REALLY want its users to rely on 3rd party software for one of the most core features of the Mac?


Someone wake me up from this nightmare...


cma

Oct 7, 2018 3:07 AM in response to cmaquino_hk

why would the MacOS team drop one of the signature features of finder


The problem is that your 'signature feature' is somebody else's 'meh, I see no use for it'.


Apple build an ecosystem and populate it with mid-range good-enough-for-lite-use apps. So, Pages and Numbers are no match for Word and Excel, Photos is no match for Lightroom and so on.


If your requirements are more demanding than the Apple apps, then yes, Apple really does want you to rely on 3rd party software. That's exactly how the system is supposed to work. At this point the only Apple app I actually use regularly is Safari. Check out Pathfinder. It is very good and not just for Coverflow. It has a whole series of features that are more powerful than the Finder.

Oct 12, 2018 12:33 PM in response to Buleohara

I seriously need coverflow back... As a photographer, I take thousands of pictures in RAW. Without coverflow, I have to view each photo individually. When each photo is 30MB, it takes my 2017 Macbook Pro 5 seconds to even load the thumbnail. I can't wait 5 seconds for each photo to load when I have thousands... Coverflow was the only way for me to be able to choose quickly which photos of the thousands I took to actually edit. Now I have to wait the 5 seconds for each thumbnail do know if it is a good shot or a bad shot... Frustrating.

Oct 15, 2018 10:20 AM in response to Buleohara

Agree, we NEED Coverflow. Column view looks like trying to replicate the not-user-friendly PC of 30 years ago. Mac always had a reputation for being more user friendly and easier top navigate. Coverflow had been one of those niceties. This set of views feels like we’re being dragged back in time. If you have a lot of files, Gallery View and Icons just don't cut it. So sad to see Apple mimicking pc views of days gone by.

Oct 21, 2018 8:01 AM in response to Buleohara

Have to agree with all the previous comments. I've just switched to Mojave and am horrified to be without Cover Flow - my preferred way to quickly scan files. I occasionally use the list mode, but 90% of the time Cover Flow is the fastest and easiest way to find what I'm looking for. The Gallery mode is frankly useless. Please restore Cover Flow ASAP.

Oct 21, 2018 12:10 PM in response to lec0rsaire

Enough petitions and they will bring it back. They should have added Gallery View ALONGSIDE Cover Flow, and not deleted it. Apple is doing this more and more: beloved features in MacOS and Apple Apps are being removed and replaced by worse / less functional ones. Perfect example: lack of HiDPI to external 4K monitors in Mojave, which existed until they removed it in High Sierra. So now that 4K and higher resolution monitors are bing adapted, Apple cut support for them: in what universe does this make any sense?

Oct 31, 2018 1:07 AM in response to woodmeister50

Time will tell.
The amount of Graphics Studios that use Cover Flow as an everyday tool is unreal. It will only take several of the big operators to flip machines to a competitor that facilitates this and Apple would start to feel it I am sure.

The amount of people I have talked to who are downgrading rather than staying with Mojave due to this is a point in itself that the new Gallery is not only rubbish but backward in technology.

Oct 31, 2018 6:53 AM in response to thedesignboard

I mainly work at video production houses around the country and most of the time I see editors and designers using Command + 1 (Icon View and make them larger with the slider then choose an Arrange By) and sometimes Quicklook to find things quickly.

At the studio I spend most time at we Tag everything obsessively so we can find them quickly. To each his own but I find Icon View way faster to find things even over Quicklook. Cover Flow to me is too "magnetic" and only shows a few assets at a time clearly since they tend to overlap.

Personally, over the years I've come to use use Icon View set to arrange by Date Added a lot actually, since clients seem to love to upload new assets to random folders all day long ("How about this one‽ USe THE RED in This Sweater.MP4.PNG_copy1.jpg", "What a nice tree!!1!!.JPG.GIF") without a care for organization or the cost of rights usage. ("No, we can't use a Rolling Stones song in this. Here's the Library music we can use...")

Cover flow missing - Mojave Gallery is no replacement?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.